Case study / Research / LLM evaluation
PrologEval
A benchmarking dashboard that pairs generated Prolog with execution tests and model-based evaluation.
01 / Context
The problem
Plausible-looking code is not enough. I wanted to compare how models solve logic-programming tasks, how their programs behave when executed, and whether another model can judge them reliably.
02 / Ownership
My contribution
- Developed the benchmarking framework and logic-programming evaluation metrics as part of collaborative research.
- Connected code generation, execution and evaluation in a configurable experiment workflow.
- Co-authored both studies; the journal article records equal contribution with Petros Kefalas. The conference paper also includes Ioanna Stamatopoulou.
03 / System design
Architecture
- 01Configure
Choose a task, generator models and generation settings in Streamlit.
- 02Generate
Request Prolog through OpenRouter and collect time, token and code metrics.
- 03Execute
Run queries with SWI-Prolog to inspect behavior independently of model judgments.
- 04Compare
Review evaluator responses alongside execution results and export reports.
04 / Evidence
Results
- Related publications
- 2
- Public framework
- Open source
- Complementary checks
- Execution + judgment
In the conference study, GPT-4.1 led the tested models, followed by Claude 3.7 Sonnet. The journal study found that harder tasks exposed performance differences and that model judges had low agreement. These are findings from those experiments, not a current model ranking.
05 / Boundaries
Limitations
- A judge's verdict is not proof of correctness; execution-based checks remain essential.
- Results apply to the tasks, model versions and settings studied.
- The current repository includes both interactive and batch workflows. Its capabilities should not be read as the exact configuration of every published experiment.
06 / Explore the code
Run locally
The repository documents Docker setup and local use. Model requests require an OpenRouter API key; Prolog execution requires SWI-Prolog, included in the documented Docker setup.
Setup instructions07 / References
Sources
- PrologEval repository
Implementation, setup and current dashboard features.
- Multi-agent benchmarking framework
SN Computer Science · July 2026. Architecture, findings and author contributions.
- Automatic generation of logic programs
BCI 2025 proceedings · published online July 2026. Earlier model comparison.